Paul Greenberg’s war on science and learning

The Arkansas Democrat Gazette dedicated today’s editorial  (free registration required) under the headline “What’s Crazy” to another attack on science as tiresome as it is unoriginal. It’s not hard to guess that it is another of editorial page editor Paul Greenberg’s attempts at showing off his ignorance in all matters academic. The editorial is dedicated to Oklahoma Senator Tom Coburn’s yearly rant against the National Science Foundation (NSF). Every year or so, Coburn releases a report picking NSF projects that he doesn’t think are worth funding. You know what, there’s a reason why scientific funding decisions at the NSF are left to competent scientific reviewers rather than politicians: the Coburn approach (putting politicians in charge of science) has already been tried – in the Soviet Union, for example – and didn’t work out so well.

The editorial is titled “Eat the shrimp, people”, and its primary showcase of alleged waste is so embarrassing one wants to cry. It concerns a study titled “Impaired Metabolism and Performance in Crustaceans Exposed to Bacteria”, awarded to Karen Burnett at College of Charleston.  The researchers study the metabolism and immune response of crustaceans under stress from hypoxia and bacterial infections. What’s wrong with that? Honestly, I don’t know and I bet neither do comrades Greenberg and Coburn. Greenberg certainly doesn’t waste column space explaining why exactly he opposes studying crustacean metabolism. Instead he explains that shrimp should rather be cooked in skillets than studied in labs, thus proving his half-wits to the half-wits who think that’s a funny joke.

What’s crazy? The Arkansas Democrat Gazette inoculating its readership with anti-scientific sentiment to make sure none of them will ever understand the physical world around them nor even the need to use the tools of science to better understand reality. As long as they can live in the fantasy world brought to them by Fox News and the Arkansas Democrat Gazette, no need to understand shrimp as long as you can cook them in butter.

What’s crazy? A senator bought and paid for by the oil industry, and the corporate media hacks at the Arkansas Democrat Gazette, crying foul about research spending they don’t like while supporting tax-payer subsidies for Big Oil to the tune of billions a year.

To read more:

Attacks on science and Coburn’s ignorance

Sen. Coburn and GMA attack Science and the NSF

How a shrimp on a treadmill became a Web sensation

Coburn’s NSF Idiocy


Americans like to fret about the alleged under-performance of the public education system. Everybody’s favorite scapegoat these days are the teachers and their unions. Which makes sense until you think about it for two seconds: teachers have very little power in the system. They aren’t the ones who set education policy, they don’t get to write the curriculum, they have no power over funding levels and priorities, they don’t control how children spend most of their time. May I suggest that a large portion of the blame lies squarely with a political class and a punditocracy inoculating American culture with anti-intellectualism on a permanent basis.

Think about it. Today’s school children are being told day in day out that science and reason are worthless, that you can make up your own facts if you like, that evolution and climate science are just matters of opinion. The political and media discourse is to a large extent controlled by anti-intellectuals and science-haters like Coburn and Greenberg. What do we expect our school children to make of that? How would they develop an interest in learning and science in a culture that treats education as a handicap, learning as nerdiness, and disinterested research as government waste?


9 thoughts on “Paul Greenberg’s war on science and learning

  1. Your comments about Greenberg and Coburn and NSF funding are excellent. As you might know, I publish a science-related column every third Sunday in the northwest Arkansas newspapers including the NWA Times. – Art Hobson

  2. Glad you stopped by Art. I wonder whether there isn’t more we can do against this madness. More than writing another reasonable letter to the editor calmly pointing out the flaws in Greenberg’s reasoning, or publishing another reasonable Art Hobson column. People like Greenberg have power and there are no checks on that power. Somebody – maybe a bunch of UA professors? – should force him to publicly defend his record, not on his own terms from his editorial perch but in public. Force him to admit that he has no clue about crustacean research, that he didn’t bother to read the project description, that he just copied some nonsense that he read online without any check. Embarrass him.

  3. I don’t know the full story on this shrimp research, but many animal studies do have direct relevance to human physiology and medicine.
    Scientists need to perform this kind of research to gain basic knowledge. Then later they may apply it to specific problem-solving.
    I wonder if this attack is just more quoting out of context.

  4. Pingback: Paul Greenberg basks in hios own smugness « arkansasmediawatch

  5. This is actually a super publication for me, Have to admit you take place to be first from the high-grade bloggers I e’er saw.Thanks for posting this informative article.

  6. Pingback: Paul Greenberg: Ignorance Rules | Arkansas Media Watch

  7. Pingback: Mike Masterson: Ignorant And Proud Of It | Arkansas Media Watch

You are welcome to leave a comment:

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s